CO129-247 - Acting Governor Fleming Governor Des Voeus - 1890 [10-12] — Page 619

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

this point in par. 12 of despatch 1620100 appears to have been overlooked ever since. So far I can make out the first Extintor & Approp: Ord. in which a similar arrangement was made was that for the year 1884 (16091/03) then mistake has been going

Just.

It was

laid down in despatch 13424/p that the loan was to be deferred until the Balances were exhausted; in each of the years 1888-1891 the Approp: Ord. should have included all the Expenditure to be incurred within the year, and to be met

I don't think that these arrangements are required Surplus Balances, including from Balances, in accordance 16201/80; the words "charged upon the Revenue of Colony" in S.1

were part of the legislation. The Ord. in that case was then the Colony in adding 2 in Schedule should have read "charged upon the Revenue (other Funds of this Colony) which

[Is it necessary to pass an indemnifying ord. for all those years? Will it be enough to give instructions for the future?]

& Copy to C.O. 27.7. 8.W.9.4/2/91

# I would wait till the Governor raises the question but give instructions as regards the future.

24.572

covers them. Estimated Expenditure For this year which is to be met partly from Balance (1)42 No proceed

see further annex 911/2

617 Av 2721

Edit History

2026-05-26 13:33:53 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

4onthis point in par. 12 of despatch 1620100 appears to have been overlooked ever since. So far I can make out the first Extintor & Approp: Ord. in which a similar arrangement was made was that for the year 1884 (16091/03) then mistake has been goingJust.It wasonlaid down in despatch 13424/p that the loan was to be deferred until the Balances were exhausted; in each of the years 1888-1891 the Approp: Ord. should have included all the Expenditure to be incurred within the year, and to be metI don't think that these arrangements are required Surplus Balances, including from Balances, in accordance 16201/80; the words "charged upon the Revenue of Colony" in S.1were part of the legislation. The Ord. in that case was then the Colony in adding 2 in Schedule should have read "charged upon the Revenue (other Funds of this Colony) which[Is it necessary to pass an indemnifying ord. for all those years? Will it be enough to give instructions for the future?]& Copy to C.O. 27.7. 8.W.9.4/2/91# I would wait till the Governor raises the question but give instructions as regards the future.24.572covers them. Estimated Expenditure For this year which is to be met partly from Balance (1)42 No proceedsee further annex 911/2617 Av 2721

Baseline (Original)

4onthis point in par. 12 of despi- 1620100 appears to have been overlooked ever since. So far I can make out the first. Extintor & Approp: Ord. in which a similar anissim was made was that for the year 1884 ( 16091/03) then mistake has been goingJuice.It wasonlaid down in dish. In 13424/p that the loan was to be deferreugifil the Balance were exhausted; in rach of the gears188h-1891 the Approf: Ord. should have included all thes Expenditure to be incurred within the Jear,Move to be metXI dont think that these anis are required Surplus belarus. including from Balances, in accordance 16201/80; the words with deep."charged upon the Revenue of Colangvin S. lдMarie the Ord. in that caseare part of the lelongham was then the Celing in adding 2 in Shait should have read "chargeduten. Ord. 9 of 1890シ the Revense Fother Zunds of this (oling) whiche[ Is it necessary to pass an indemnitying ord. for all those will it be enough to give instanctions for the future? IJears& Copycow. to a.o. 2.7. 8.W.9.4/2/91# I would wait till the fundeter gaines the question but give instructions as reards the future.24.572covers them. Estimated Expenditure For this year which is to be met partly from Balance (1)42 No proceedamQmEw 6zl912see further an-911/2سلام617 Av 2721ì

2026-05-26 13:33:53 · Baseline

View content

this point in par. 12 of despi- 1620100 appears to have been overlooked ever since. So far I can make out the first. Extintor & Approp: Ord. in which a similar anissim was made was that for the year 1884 ( 16091/03) then mistake has been going

Juice.

It was

laid down in dish. In 13424/p

that the loan was

to be deferre

ugifil the Balance

were exhausted;

in rach of the gears

188h-1891 the Approf: Ord.

should have included all thes Expenditure to be incurred within the

Jear,

Move to be met

X I dont think that these anis

are required

Surplus

belarus.

including from Balances, in accordance 16201/80; the words

with deep.

"charged upon the Revenue of

Colang

vin S. l

Marie

the Ord. in that case

are part of the lelong

ham

was then the Celing

in adding

in Shait

should have read "chargeduten. Ord. 9 of 1890

シ

the Revense Fother Zunds of this (oling) whiche

[ Is it necessary to pass an indemnitying ord. for all those

will it be enough to give instanctions for the future? I

Jears

& Copy cow. to a.o. 2.7.

8.W.9.4/2/91

# I would wait till the fundeter gaines the question but give instructions as reards the future.

24.572

covers them. Estimated Expenditure For this year which is to be met

partly from Balance

(1)42 No proceed

Ew 6zl

912

see further an

-911/2

سلام

617

2721

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.